As the European football season moves toward its peak with Cup Finals and hard-battled definitive association coordinates with that sort out champs, survivors, and failures, it is time back to think back out of resentment. In case you’re a genuine fan, and follow each round of your cherished group, knowing the abilities and shortfalls of every player, you will have a lot to be furious about.
You will be enraged with the various choices by arbitrators and their group that have conflicted with the football crew you support. You will be irritated with choices made for the rival group, particularly when the TV screens in a split second replay the occasion, outlining in energetic shading the choice wasn’t right.
You will meet with your companions in the bar, watch the replay, remember the game and revile uproariously at the various helpless choices. Besides, you will be irate there is no way around it, and you’ll ask why the different Football Associations don’t make a move.
Your resentment will be chiefly aimed at the ref, presumably in boisterous voice during the match, yet while you’re reviling his uncouthness there are issues you should likewise consider:
1. The arbitrator can just put together his choices with respect to the OK proof gave
2. The rundown of satisfactory proof does exclude that of TV slow-movement replays
3. In the 90 or thereabouts minutes of each match, an arbitrator can settle on many choices dependent on proof saw by the natural eye, and many sentiments from his linesmen and fourth authority.
…also, this implies 100% exactness is unthinkable.
The game of tennis conquered this issue with an electronic gadget giving 100% precise choices in regards to the ball leaving play, yet the Football Associations won’t think about comparative choices, not to mention test them.
“The entryway is shut. The choice was made not to utilize innovation by any stretch of the imagination,” FIFA general secretary Jerome Valcke expressed in March 2010, dismissing the utilization of innovation as a help to the arbitrator. ความเป็นมาญี่ปุ่น
One needs to ask why.
The sport of football has everything to acquire from electronic help:
1. 100% precision on objectives; knowing whether the ball goes too far.
2. 100% exactness on when the ball has left play
3. 100% exactness on offsides
4. Visual proof of all fouls from different point, prompting 100% exactness on choices
5. The decrease and possible end of ‘cheating’ to win or lose a game
6. The decrease and possible disposal of ‘fixed’ matches by card sharks
The game doesn’t have anything to lose, the Football Associations don’t have anything to lose (apparently), thus it gives off an impression of being an easy decision.
If the Football Associations will not think about an electronic choice, they should give a satisfactory justification for why or leave themselves open to the guess that they’re profiting from the current circumstance.
Fouls and Injuries
One more serious issue with the sport of football, requiring prompt activity to benefit the game and advantage to all players, is with brutal foul assaults, or ‘brandishing fouls’ or ‘expert fouls’ as they will in general be called. Would you be able to envision the commotion if Murray flung his tennis racket at Nadal in the wake of losing a point, or Montgomery swinging with his 2-iron at Crenshaw’s legs, while Ben is going to hit the ball?
It simply doesn’t occur, so for what reason do we permit it to occur in football? It isn’t adequate for a player like youngster Aaron Ramsey of Arsenal to experience a frightful broken leg, putting him out of the game for a half year or more, while the player incurring the injury plays for.
One quick strategy to affect players to take care with their handles is to guarantee the assailant is off the field for a similar time span as the harmed player. At the point when a player makes a brutal tackle on, a clinical player help and needs to leave the field, then, at that point, the assailant should likewise leave the field until his return.
In the event that the player is adequately harmed to miss the remainder of the game, the aggressor stays of the pitch until the player is managed fit to return, regardless of whether that is in multi week or a half year. This will dispose of the ‘brandishing fouls’ that a few players are so glad and satisfied to incur. It will likewise shut down those ‘assaults’ on the game’s driving objective scorers by safeguards whose sole target is by all accounts to remove the player from the game at any expense.
This recommended framework is far from being great, and can prompt further abuse if not observed with care, yet it’s a beginning towards tidying up the game and saving football.
The World Cup
The football World Cup competition will be played this mid year of 2010, and what number of terrible choices will destroy a country’s possibilities? What number of groups will lose a game or two by erroneous decisions from the ref and linesmen? Will the cup-last itself become a ruins, without the help of present day innovation.
Maybe it will take something to that effect to awaken FIFA, and prod them to activity.
Football Fans Act Now!
Allies can make the Football Association of their nation pay heed by not going to the initial round of the 2010/2011 Season in August this year. Seeing a huge number of void seats and missing millions in income will hit them where it harms and can drive them to think about the fans.